But, but, but .... So let's put this thing up on two feet. Here's the deal:

Are
the laws of physics invariant for all possible Observers ? If you have
Observer1 O1 and Observer2 O2, are the laws of physics the same for both
of them such that:

L = f1(O1) = f2(O2)

where L is an
invariant form of the Laws of Physics in all possible reference systems
according to all possible Observers ( all possible Information
Processing Networks in newly designed Brains, all possible Processors),
f1 is a particular function relative to the particular design of the
particular Observer O1 and f2 is another specific function relative to
the specific design of Observer2 O2 such that they transform the
expression of all of the invariant repetitive laws discovered in one
reference system O1 into the equivalent, but one to one association
expression of the corresponding invariant repetitive laws discovered on
behalf of Observer2 ?

Does L and f1 and f2 exist for all possible
Observers ? And if so, does it even matter ? It matters to us because
we like to discover mathematical relationships valid in all possible
situations (aka reference systems), but in the end what counts is the
Experience the Observer undergoes in his world, and that is his reality
and his universe and his laws of physics.

On the one hand, I
doubt that L, f1 and f2 can exist given how radically different an
Observer (a Processor) design can be, aside from the fact that you can
hard wire Observers so that they can never discover their underlying
laws or any laws, or you can hard wire an Observer - Processor to
perceive any wild and random laws as far out and detached and unrelated
to our laws (or other laws of physics existing for any other observers -
processors) as possible, or hard wire an observer so that it always
only Lies to itself and falsifies (simulates ?) all reality.

On
the other hand, no matter how hard we try, we are always seeing
everything through our reference system, our logic and our laws of
physics, we are chained into a fixed f1 and O1 so to say and cannot say
anything at all about f2 and O2, or something like that. And even if we
can see some of what O2 sees, and even if we mix O1 and O2, and even
anything else, no matter how hard we try, we can never be all possible
Observers, and see things through all possible Observers, we will always
format everything automatically according to what we already know, to
some kind of fixed but arbitrary logic and processing machine, etc. We
are trapped in our reference system no matter how hard we try to escape
it and see beyond it and see a number of distinct reference systems from
a more general reference system, from the outside looking in so to say,
but we are never outside, we are always inside since we are trapped
into some very simple laws from the outset like the Identity Principle
and the Principles of Non Contradiction and such (and Space and Time and
Extension references and so on).

So the only solution is to
simply crack open skulls, crack open your own skull and pour wild stuff
in it, design crazy circuits and contraptions and stick it in you skull,
Jethro Skull, go for it man, or simply assign the V8 Engine as a new
Man Brain and Observe what it is observing from the outside, imagine how
the world appears to that engine and such, be crazy, be wild, party on
folks, party on....

TOBOR THE EIGHTH MAN

## No comments:

## Post a Comment